Legal Opinion

Kent v. Addicks

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 18, 1903No. 1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, District Judge.

This action grows out of the following contract:

“Memorandum of agreement made this 12th day of December, 1895, between E. H. Rollins & Sons, of Boston, as agents for S. L. Kent, of Olifton Heights, Pennsylvania, and the Bay State Gas Company of Delaware.
“Whereas the said Kent has purchased the right to vend, use and manufacture acetylene gas in Massachusetts, under certain patent rights, from the Electro-Gas Co., of West Virginia, and the United States Acetylene Liquefaction Co. of New York.
“And whereas the said Báy State Gas Co. of Delaware desires to purchase all…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  3. Martin v. WebbSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  5. Sherman v. FitchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Byers v. ZuspanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Evans v. ElyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  3. Petersen v. Wellsville CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  4. Bloom v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  5. Eisinger v. E. J. Murphy Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API