Legal Opinion
Petersen v. Wellsville City
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 6, 1926No. 7073PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNGER, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, E. J. Petersen and R. S. Petersen, entered into a written contract on July 28, 1920, with the defendant in error, Wells-ville City, Utah, hereafter called city, to build for the city a large amount of concrete sidewalk, and to do the grading and other incidental work necessary to complete the contract, for an agreed price of $41,642.17. They brought this suit against the city to recover damages, alleging that the city had repudiated the contract. The jury returned a verdict for the city, and judgment was entered thereon. At the trial E. J.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mobile & Montgomery Railway Co. v. JureySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- West v. CamdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Lancaster v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Brobst v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Ralph and Carolee Thomas v. Montelucia VillasArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co. v. Foster Boat Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Miller v. Schwinn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Western Grocer Co. v. New York Oversea Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.