Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Fischer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 10, 1986No. 12778PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDannehy, J.
The plaintiff applied to the Superior Court for a writ of habeas corpus to determine the custody of a minor child. The court dismissed the application for lack of personal jurisdiction. The plaintiff *198appealed to the Appellate Court, and we transferred the appeal here on our own motion. Practice Book § 3004A. We find no error.
The plaintiff, a layman, tried his own case and prepared and argued his appeal in this court. The defendant has not appeared either in the trial court or this court. On reviewing the record, we have followed the liberal policy usual where a layman appears pro se and have…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Frazer v. McGowanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Cersosimo v. CersosimoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Robertson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. DiFazioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Jones v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Turner v. FroweinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Cato v. CatoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Anghel v. Saint Francis Hospital & Medical CenterConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Fischer v. GoldsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Green v. DeFrankConnecticut Superior Court · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.