Legal Opinion
Fischer v. Goldstein
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 24, 1988No. 4669PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.
The respondent father appeals from a decision of the trial court rendered pursuant to the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (URESA); General Statutes §§ 46b-180 through 46b-211; finding paternity of his illegitimate child now living in the Federal Republic of Germany.1 General Statutes § 46b-180 et seq. The trial court found the Federal Republic of Germany (hereinafter West Germany) to be a “state” within the meaning of General Statutes § 46b-180 (12). The respondent had previously filed and appealed from the denial of a writ of habeas corpus to determine the custody of the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Moffat v. MoffatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. LenihanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Raymond v. RaymondSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- State v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Kline v. KlineSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BowdenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
- Taravella v. StanleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Fischer v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988