Legal Opinion
Basile v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 29, 1982No. C-1-82-740, C-1-82-748, C-1-82-774 and C-1-82-857PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPIEGEL, District Judge:
This matter came on for consideration of defendant Rex Railway’s motion to dismiss (doc. 7), plaintiffs’ memorandum in opposition (doc. 11), and defendant’s reply memorandum (doc. 13). 1 For reasons to be discussed, we hereby deny defendant’s motion.
These actions for fraud were brought pursuant to section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, and the common law of the state of Ohio. All but one of the plaintiffs in Dickerhoff also assert a…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In Re Catanella and EF Hutton and Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- The Ltd., Inc. v. McCrory Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Hudson v. Capital Management International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.