Legal Opinion

Fred Paquin v. City of St Ignace

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 2017No. 334350PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, Fred Paquin, appeals as of right an order of the Mackinac Circuit Court denying his motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10) (no genuine issue of material fact, and moving party entitled to judgment as a matter of law), declaring him ineligible to run for city council in defendant, the City of St. Ignace, and dismissing his complaint for declaratory relief with prejudice. We affirm.

I. PERTINENT FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The pertinent facts are not in dispute. On January 19, 2010, the United States Attorney's Office filed an indictment against plaintiff and his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. Abela v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. NashMichigan Supreme Court · 1983

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fred Paquin v. City of St IgnaceMichigan Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API