Abela v. General Motors Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion. This case poses the question whether the federal consumer product warranty act prohibits enforcement of a binding arbitration agreement entered into by a person who purchases a vehicle under a motor vehicle manufacturer’s employee purchase plan. The trial court ruled that such a binding arbitration agreement is prohibited by the federal act. The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s decision, relying on the supposedly binding authority of the decisions of two federal circuit courts of appeals. We affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals, but do so because we are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Thomas E. Walton Le'ellen Walton v. Rose Mobile Homes Llc, Southern Energy Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Michael Shane Davis v. Southern EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Wells v. the Detroit News, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Schueler v. WeintrobMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by223 opinions
- People v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Walters v. NadellMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
- Gorman v. American Honda Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- People of Michigan v. Christopher Duran HeadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jawad a Shah Md Pc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
218 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.