Legal Opinion

City of Englewood v. Reffel

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 23, 1970No. 22845PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day

The proceedings involved herein were instituted pursuant to the provisions of C.R.S. 1963, 50-1-1, et seq., as amended. Plaintiff in error, the City of Englewood, was petitioner below seeking to acquire by right of eminent domain six parcels of realty for street purposes. This writ of error relates only to two of those parcels, numbered 4 and 5. The defendants in error were respondents below — John W. Reffel, Jr. and Dorothy J. Hynes were named respondents as to parcel 4, and John W. Reffel and Alma L. Reffel were named respondents as to parcel 5. There was a consolidated trial relating to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Colorado Cent. R. v. AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Knoth v. BarclaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  3. Colorado M. R'y Co. v. CromanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1891
  4. G. B. & L. R'y Co. v. HaggartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. Board of Directors v. CalvaresiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc. v. City of SterlingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Board of County Com'rs of Weld County v. AndersonColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Karraz v. TaylorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Upper Eagle Valley Sanitation District v. CarnieColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. City of Englewood v. ReffelColorado Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API