Legal Opinion
Jose v. Houck
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1948No. 11749PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEALY, Circuit Judge.
This case involves conflicting claims to four contiguous sections of surveyed public lands in Imperial county, California. The sections contain deposits of montmorillonite, a mineral of a clay-like composition having value as a food supplement for poultry, cattle, and agricultural plants. They were withdrawn from entry in 1920 by an order of the Department of thé In*212terior, and a further withdrawal was made in 1941 by executive order for military purposes. The withdrawal orders remained in effect' until July 6, 1945, when they were revoked and the land reopened to entry on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Steele v. Tanana Mines R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1906
- Cascaded v. BortolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., & Hugh Brown, United States of America v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co., Ltd., and Hugh BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Consolidated Mines & Smelting Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Flynn v. VevelstadDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.