Legal Opinion

Marriage of Rudolf v. Rudolf

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1984No. C3-83-590PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONETT, Justice.

We decide that the full faith and credit clause does not preclude Minnesota from modifying future alimony installments in a Nevada divorce decree, and we reverse the trial court’s contrary ruling and remand.

In November 1965, after 12 years of marriage, a valid divorce decree was entered in Nevada divorcing John and Dolores Rudolf. The decree required, among other things, that John pay Dolores alimony of $250 a month from and after December 31, 1966. Mr. and Mrs. Rudolf were domiciled in New Jersey but John Rudolf established the requisite Nevada residency to petition for the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Yarborough v. YarboroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  4. In Re Marriage of KuppingerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Elkind v. ByckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marriage of Arora v. AroraCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API