Doe v. Condon
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
Petitioner sought to have the Court accept this matter in its original jurisdiction to determine whether certain tasks performed by a non-attorney employee in a law firm constitute the unauthorized practice of law. Specifically, petitioner asks (1) whether it is the unauthorized practice of law for a paralegal employed by an attorney to conduct informational seminars for the general public on wills and trusts without the attorney being present; (2) whether it is the unauthorized practice of law for a paralegal employed by an attorney to meet with clients privately at the attorney’s office,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. Buyers Service Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
- In Re Unauthorized Practice of Law RulesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- In Re Mid-America Living Trust Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- State v. DespainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Oregon State Bar v. John H. Miller Formerly Executive Estate Planners, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hatleberg v. Norwest Bank WisconsinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Bolen v. Crowe (In Re Holmes)District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2004
- In re DeddishSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP v. WilsonDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2023