Legal Opinion

Newman v. Beard

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 16, 2010No. 08-2652PublishedCited by 186 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Clifford Newman, a convicted sex offender, argues that the Parole Board violated his First Amendment right, his right to due process, and the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution by using his refusal to admit his guilt to adversely affect his eligibility for parole.

I

Background

In 1987, Newman was found guilty of committing two rapes and related sexual offenses after a jury trial in a Pennsylvania state court. He was sentenced in 1988 to twenty to forty years imprisonment. Newman ultimately exhausted his direct and post-conviction…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by186 opinions

  1. Mandel v. M & Q Packaging Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Thomas Wisniewski v. FisherCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
  3. Sharp v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  4. Montanez v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Evans v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011

181 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API