United States v. Charles Johnson, Genelda Johnson, Francis Vaner Johnson, and Johnson Cranberries, LLP
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In December 1999, the United States filed a civil action against Defendants, claiming that they had discharged pollutants into federally-regulated waters without a permit in violation of provisions of the Clean Water Act in the operation of their cranberry farm. Defendants challenged the United States’ jurisdiction over the properties in question. In separate rulings on liability and remedy, the district court granted summary judgment in favor of the government, reasoning that “there is a sufficient basis for the United States to exercise jurisdiction because the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bassiri v. Xerox Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Northern California River Watch v. City of HealdsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Northern California River Watch v. City of HealdsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Cape Fear River Watch, Inc. v. Duke Energy Progress, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.