Legal Opinion

Northern California River Watch v. City of Healdsburg

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 10, 2006No. 04-15442PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Defendant/Appellant City of Healdsburg (“Healdsburg”) appeals the district court’s judgment in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Northern California River Watch (“River Watch”), an environmental group, in this litigation under the Clean Water Act (“CWA”). Plaintiff alleges that Healds-burg, without first obtaining a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit, violated the CWA by discharging sewage from its waste treatment plant into waters covered by the Act. Healdsburg discharged the sewage into a body of water known as “Basalt Pond,” a rock quarry pit…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps of EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Rapanos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. RobisonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Northern California River Watch v. City of HealdsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. MosesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API