Legal Opinion

Kargus v. State

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 27, 2007No. 92,432PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This case raises two principal questions. First, does a criminal defendant whose felony conviction and sentence have been affirmed by the Court of Appeals have a right to effective assistance of appointed appellate counsel when fifing a petition requesting this court’s discretionary review of the Court of Appeals’ decision? Second, if a defendant does have such a right in a direct appeal, is the right denied when appointed counsel fails to file a petition after the defendant has requested that a petition be filed? To resolve the second…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Board of County Commissioners v. City of Park CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. Swenson v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  3. State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  4. State v. MoyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API