Legal Opinion

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Frank J. TRABUCCO, Et Al., Defendants, Appellees

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided May 14, 1986No. 85-1997PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the principle of stare decisis forecloses re-determination of an issue raised, considered, and decided in a prior case where the presentation of evidence has been “one-sided”, with no proffer of rebuttal expert testimony. Our answer is that stare deci-sis still applies and, on this record, forecloses redetermination.

This case, brought by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, its Commissioner of Public Safety and its Board of Retirement, challenges the Massachusetts statutory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cantor v. Detroit Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Mahoney v. TrabuccoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Harriett C. Russell, of the Estate of T. C. Russell, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Popkins v. ZagelDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985
  5. Mahoney v. TrabuccoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Daniel J. GATELY, Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Et Al., Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Lowe v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Luis Reveron MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 1564 of New Mexico v. Albertson's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. ASSAADBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2003

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API