Legal Opinion

Close v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 24, 2008No. 06SC520PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

In this Crim. P. 35(c) case, we are asked to address the issue of whether conflict-free counsel should be appointed for James Close in order to investigate and pursue potential relief from operation of the post-conviction time bar, at a trial court hearing, based upon the justifiable excuse or excusable neglect exception to the time bar and a colorable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for failure to raise the applicability of People v. Nguyen, 900 P.2d 37 (Colo.1995). The Colorado Office of the Public Defender represented Close in direct appeal and post-conviction proceedings…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. CALVARESTSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  3. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. Close v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  5. People v. AbiodunSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  2. People v. Chavez-TorresSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  3. People v. RainerColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. KadellColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. People v. BonanColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API