Legal Opinion

People v. Rainer

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 11, 2013No. 10CA2414PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by JUDGE LOEB

¶ 1 Defendant, Atorrus Leon Rainer, appeals the trial court's order denying his Crim. P. 35(c) motion, which argued that his 112-year sentence is unconstitutional, pursuant to Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010). As a matter of first impression, we conclude that, under the circumstances here, Rainer's aggregate sentence is functionally a life sentence without parole and, thus, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Accordingly, we reverse the order, vacate the sentence, and remand for resentencing.

I.…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rainer v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
  2. People v. VallesColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. LuceroColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. FrittsColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Rodney Dewayne MCDONALDColorado Court of Appeals · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API