Legal Opinion
Rothman v. Target Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 13, 2009No. 2008-1375PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
By jury verdict, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey found claims 1, 5, and 12 of U.S. Patent No. 6,855,029 (“the '029 patent”) invalid. In addition, the jury declined to find in fringement by appellee Motherwear International (“Motherwear”). The jury also found the '029 patent unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. The district court sustained the jury’s verdict on all counts, denying Ms. Rothman’s and Glamourmom LLC’s (“Glamourmom’s”) motions for judgment as a matter of law (“JMOL”) and awarded costs to Appellees. Rothman v. Target Corp.,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kingsdown Medical Consultants, Ltd. And E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. Hollister IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- amazon.com, Inc. v. barnesandnoble.com, Inc. And barnesandnoble.com, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- C.R. Bard, Inc. v. M3 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Tokai Corp. v. Easton Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Larson Manufacturing Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. Aluminart Products Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- United Food & Commercial Workers Unions & Emp'rs Midwest Health Benefits Fund v. Novartis Pharm. Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- Apotex Inc. v. Ucb, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Medisim Ltd. v. Bestmed LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.