Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLC

¶70 (dissenting) — The majority incorrectly frames the issue, answers the wrong question, and ignores *820the nature of the homeowners’ claims. The issue before us is whether a claim for breach of implied warranty, established by Washington statute after consultation with the stakeholders, imposed on Washington state builders, to protect condominium purchasers in Washington State, is preempted by federal laws because some of the materials used in building condominiums came from across the border. The answer is no because the homeowners’ claims are not predicated upon defective materials that were…