Legal Opinion
Callicrate v. Wadsworth Manufacturing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 31, 2005No. 2004-1597PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Callierate is the owner of several patents on methods and apparatuses for castrating large animals (like cattle), including U.S. Patent No. 5,236,434 (the ’434 patent); U.S. Patent No. 5,997,553 (the ’553 patent); and U.S. Patent No. 5,681,329 (the ’329 patent). Callierate initiated suit against Wadsworth Manufacturing, Inc. (Wads-worth) on two of these patents in the United States District Court for the District of Montana, asserting that Wads-worth’s EZE No. 2 and No. 3 castration tools (or use thereof) infringed claims 7, 11, 18, 19, 22, 25, 27, and 30 of the ’329…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Innova/pure Water, Inc. v. Safari Water Filtration Systems, Inc. (Doing Business as Safari Outdoor Products)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Presidio Components, Inc. v. American Technical Ceramics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re NTP, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Ncube Corp. (Now C-Cor, Inc.) v. Seachange International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Milwaukee Elec. Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.