Legal Opinion

Viccaro v. Milunsky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1990PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

A judge of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts has certified novel questions of Massachusetts law to this court. See S.J.C. Rule 1:03, as appearing in 382 Mass. 700 (1981). The judge asks whether a child who was born with a genetic defect and his parents have bases under Massachusetts law for recovery against a physician whose negligent preconception counseling led the parents to decide to conceive children.

The facts presented to us in association with the certified questions are brief. In November, 1976, not then married, the Viccaros consulted the defendant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Payton v. Abbott LabsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Jackson v. BumgardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Laboratory Corp. of America v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  2. Pamela Plowman and Jeremy Plowman v. Fort Madison Community Hospital, Pil Kang, John Paiva, Davis Radiology, P.C., Leah Steffensmeier, the Women's Center, and Fort Madison Physicians and SurgeonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Reed v. CampagnoloCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Arche v. United StatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  5. Cauman v. George Washington UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API