Legal Opinion

Reed v. Campagnolo

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided September 17, 1993No. Misc. No. 1, September Term, 1993PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

This case of alleged medical malpractice comes to us from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, pursuant to the Maryland Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act (the Act), Md.Code (1974, 1989 RepLVol.), §§ 12-601 through 12-609 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article (CJ). The certified questions are:

“i. Whether the State of Maryland recognizes a tort cause of action for wrongful birth when the doctor does not inform the patient about an available diagnostic test which might reveal the possibility of neural tube defects of the fetus, when…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Becker v. SchwartzNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  3. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sard v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Naccash v. BurgerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Pittway Corp. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  2. Swedish Civil Aviation Admin. v. Project Management Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  3. Dehn v. EdgecombeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  4. Laboratory Corp. of America v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  5. Parler & Wobber v. Miles & Stockbridge, P.C.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API