United States v. Pruitt
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
*149 Opinion of the Comt
CRAWFORD, Judge:
Contrary to Ms pleas, appellant was convicted by a special court-martial with members at Royal Air Force Lakenheath, England, of 2 specifications each of making a false official statement and of larceny, in violation of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 907 and 921, respectively. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a bad-conduct discharge, 6 months’ confinement, partial forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings and the sentence. 48 MJ 864…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. MannUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. Tommy Ray Wells and B. C. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. RobertsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. TomchekUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. HumpherysCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. KerrCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. HughesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
- United States v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. DiazNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.