Legal Opinion

In Re Wehr's Estate

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1934No. 7,189PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The main question involved is: May a nonresident illegitimate nominate an administrator under the provisions of subdivision 2 of section 10072, Rev. Codes 1921? We contend that he is not such a "child" as is mentioned in that section or in section 10068, and therefore has not the right of nomination in the present premises.

In McDonald v. Southern Railway, 71 S.C. 352, 51 S.E. 138, 110 Am. St. Rep. 576, 2 L.R.A. (n.s.) 640, the court adopts with approval the following language: "It is a well-recognized rule of construction that prima facie, the word `child' or `children' when used in a statute…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Hicks v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  4. In re the Estate of GorkowWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  5. In Re Wray's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Glick v. KnollMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re Estate of DauenhauerMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Miller v. DauenhauerMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Blanco EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. In Re Adams' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API