Bobby, Jack Howard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
A rehearing before the court en banc was ordered by a majority of the judges of this Circuit, 28 U.S.C.A. § 46(c), to settle the questions upon which the judges composing the original panel were in disagreement. See Howard v. United States, 5 Cir., 229 F.2d 602.
As to the most important question, the proper test of criminal responsibility where insanity is asserted, we note that the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia has heretofore taken the position that the Supreme Court in Davis v. United States, 165 U.S. 373, 375, 17 S.Ct. 360, 41 L.Ed. 750, at least…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Matheson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- John Joseph Blake v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- State v. LucasSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- United States v. James L. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.