Legal Opinion
Staton v. GUARANTEE STATE BANK OF MANGUM
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 7, 2007No. 103,601PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge.
¶ 1 The trial court defendant Guarantee State Bank of Mangum, Oklahoma (Bank), appeals a judgment awarding the plaintiffs Dale Staton and Carolyn Staton (Statons) attorney fees and costs in their successful action against the Bank. The Statons appeal from the same judgment asserting that the Trial Court erred in awarding them substantially less than the amount of attorney fees requested in their motion.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The underlying facts and claims of this matter are best stated using Section I of the Statons’ Brief:
PLAINTIFFS DALE STATON AND CAROLYN STATON’S…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Oliver's Sports Center, Inc. v. National Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Green Bay Packaging v. Preferred Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bank of Kremlin v. DavisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
- Staton v. GUARANTEE STATE BANK OF MANGUMCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007