Higgins v. Intex Recreation Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Sweeney, A.C.J.
This is a suit for personal injury damages based on product liability. To make a case, the plaintiffs had to show that the product was not reasonably safe as designed. Ultimately our disposition here turns on whether the plaintiffs’ showing at trial was sufficient to send the question of the product’s (a snow tube) safety to the jury. The plaintiffs submit that the snow tube went too fast, had no means for the rider to control it, and turned the rider into a fixed backward position. The product distributor responds essentially that this is what the tube was designed to do and…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Keller v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Mains Farm Homeowners Ass'n v. WorthingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Reagan v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Parentage of LBWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Carvin v. BritainWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Parrilla v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Knox Ex Rel. Estate of Ellis v. Palestine Liberation OrganizationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.