Legal Opinion

Primus v. Padula

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided May 27, 2008No. C.A. 4:07-cv-02652-PMD-TERPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.

This matter is before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. The Record contains a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of a United States Magistrate Judge which was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). A dissatisfied party may object, in writing, to an R & R within ten days after being served with a copy of that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Petitioner filed timely objections to the R & R.

BACKGROUND

Although the Magistrate Judge’s R & R contained a thorough…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API