Primus v. Padula
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PATRICK MICHAEL DUFFY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. The Record contains a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of a United States Magistrate Judge which was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). A dissatisfied party may object, in writing, to an R & R within ten days after being served with a copy of that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Petitioner filed timely objections to the R & R.
BACKGROUND
Although the Magistrate Judge’s R & R contained a thorough…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.