Bland v. Bland
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BRITT, Judge.
The first question presented is whether summary judgment is proper in this action. We hold that it is. The purpose of the summary judgment procedure provided by G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, is to ferret out those cases in which there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and in which, upon undisputed facts, a party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Savings & Loan Assoc. v. Trust Co., 282 N.C. 44, 191 S.E. 2d 683 (1972) ; Haithcock v. Chimney Rock Co., 10 N.C. App. 696, 179 S.E. 2d 865 (1971).
In this case, admissions in the pleadings, together with affidavits and other…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Eaton v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
- Haithcock v. Chimney Rock CompanyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Layton v. LaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Crews v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- A-S-P Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Minor v. MinorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Redevelopment Com'n of Greenville v. HannafordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Haynes v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.