Legal Opinion

Foote v. State

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 2019No. CC 17CV49853 (SC S065883)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before we consider whether these particular plaintiffs have standing to bring the declaratory judgment action that is before us, we describe the relevant analytical framework. Whether a plaintiff has standing to bring a particular kind of action "largely depends on the statute under which the plaintiff seeks relief." MT & M Gaming, Inc. v. City of Portland , 360 Or. 544, 553, 383 P.3d 800 (2016). Here, plaintiffs seek declaratory relief under ORS 28.020, which provides:

"Any person * * * whose rights, status or other legal relations are affected by a constitution, statute, municipal charter,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gortmaker v. SeatonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. EACRET ET UX v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Morgan v. Sisters School District 6Oregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. TVKO v. HowlandOregon Supreme Court · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kimberly Johns v. Nestucca Valley School District, et al.District Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  2. Marion County v. Oregon Health AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026
  3. State Of Washington V. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  4. State Of Washington V. American Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API