Legal Opinion

Smith v. Indiana Department of Correction

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 2008No. 49S02-0804-CV-166PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

In 2004, Indiana enacted a “Three Strikes Law” providing that an inmate “may not file a complaint” if the inmate has filed three prior lawsuits that were dismissed as frivolous under the “Frivolous Claim Law.” Other jurisdictions seek to curb litigant abuses by imposing conditions on lawsuits by ‘(frequent filers.” Indiana’s Three Strikes Law goes further and purports to close the courthouse door altogether. We hold that this legislation violates the Open Courts Clause of the Indiana Constitution.

Facts and Procedural History

In 2005, Eric D. Smith was an inmate at the Maximum…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ricky Ashley v. E. Dilworth, Co-1, Maximum Security UnitCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  3. Molski v. Evergreen Dynasty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Lee Hampton v. Ron HobbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. William Riccard v. Prudential Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. KS&E Sports and Edward J. Ellis v. Dwayne H. RunnelsIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Smith v. DonahueIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. ClaycombMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Bauer v. ShepardDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API