Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Claycomb

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 2018No. 2017-SC-000614-TG; 2017-SC-000615-TGPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*204OPINION OF THE COURT BY CHIEF JUSTICE MINTON

Of all the rights guaranteed by state constitutions but absent from the federal Bill of Rights, the guarantee of a right of access to the courts to obtain a remedy for injury is possibly the most important.1 Kentucky's version of this guarantee, referred to in our jurisprudence as the open-courts provision, appears in the Bill of Rights, Section 14, of the Kentucky Constitution, which states: "All courts shall be open, and every person for an injury done him in his lands, goods, person or reputation, shall have remedy by due course of law, and right…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Johnson v. St. Vincent Hospital, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Jones v. State Board of MedicineIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Calloway County Sheriff's Department v. Karen Woodall Spouse of Steven SpillmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Calloway County Sheriff's Department v. Karen Woodall Spouse of Steven SpillmanKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Travis M. BredholdKentucky Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Craig Snowden v. Kevin Snyder Art M.D.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
  5. Daniel Cameron, in His Official Capacity as Kentucky Attorney General v. Andy Beshear, in His Official Capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API