Legal Opinion

Cranmer v. Graham

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1825PublishedCited by 6 opinions

ERROR to the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Cranmer declared against Graham in assumpsit. The first count is for 12 months’ wages, as a labourer, at 9 dollars and 25 cents per month, amounting to 111 dollars. The second count is a general indebitatus assumpsit for work and labour. Pleas, non-assumpsit, and accord and satisfaction. After two verdicts in favour of the plaintiff, and two new trials, the case came before the Court on a demurrer to evidence. Two witnesses were sworn. The evidence of the first was, that in January, 1822, he saw the plaintiff at work at the defendant’s, and the defendant told the witness that he was to give…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Felton v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  2. Adams v. CosbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Jackson v. CreekIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Epperly v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
  5. De Camp v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API