Legal Opinion

Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Foster

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1909No. 15,895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Sedgwick district court; Thomas C. Wilson, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C.' J.:

This was an action brought by the Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Company, a corporation, as assignees of Van Arsdale & Osborne, partners engaged in the insurance brokerage business, against ■John W. Foster, a solicitor of insurance under them. Van Arsdale & Osborne were general agents for the St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, of St. Paul, Minn., and it was alleged that they employed John W. Foster to solicit insurance for the St; Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company in consideration of the payment of a certain per cent, of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Berry v. CraigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Edwards v. HartshornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Raver v. WebsterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856
  4. Citizens' Bank v. BrighamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  5. First National Bank v. NorthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. E. D. Metcalf Co. v. GilbertWyoming Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Carter Oil Co. v. GarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Merywethers v. YoumansSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. Menrow v. PoolSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API