Citizens' Bank v. Brigham
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from court of appeals^ southern department; A. W. Dennison, B. F. Milton, and M. Schoonover,, judges.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Doster, 0. J. :
A phase of this controversy has been in this court before. (Brigham, v. Jones, 48 Kan. 162, 30 Pac. 113.) Jones & Everetts, a firm of merchants, were indebted to the Citizens’ Bank of Emporia and certain others, and they executed an instrument, intended by them as a chattel mortgage, to secure the indebtedness of the bank and the others as preferred creditors. It was executed to J. W. Eastman as trustee. J. W. Brigham & Co., to whom Jones & *728Everetts were indebted, but who had not been secured by the chattel mortgage, after recovering a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cadwell's Bank v. CrittendenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1885
- J. W. Brigham & Co. v. Jones & EverettsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
- Roberts, Butler & Co. v. PressSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Robinson v. New York, L. E. & W. R.New York Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by16 opinions
- North Carolina Railroad v. StorySupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Maxwell v. HarperWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Stethem v. SkinnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1905
- Kinsley Milling Co. v. WaiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
- Bair v. School District No. 141 of Smith CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.