Elliott v. Bloyd
Oregon Supreme Court
Prom Multnomah: John B. Cleland, Judge. Suit by Mary Elliott and others against Clarence R. Bloyd and another. Prom a decree in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Justice 'Wolverton
delivered the opinion.
On October 20, 1896, Mary Elliott and Samuel Elliott, her husband, and W. C. Elliott, as parties of the first part, entered into an agreement with the defendant Clarence R. Bloyd, as party of the second part, of tenor following: ‘ ‘ That the said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the agreements herein promised to be done and performed by the party of the second part, hereby bargain, sell, and convey to said party of the second part all the saw timber on the following described premises, * * * for the agreed price of twenty-five…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bishop v. BaisleyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Farwell v. NeedhamOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Sheridan v. McMullenOregon Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by16 opinions
- Coquille Mill & Tug Co. v. Robert Dollar Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Belt Et Ux. v. MatsonOregon Supreme Court · 1926
- Roots v. Boring Junction Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- George L. Jantzer Et At. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- ANDERSON ET UX. v. MoothartOregon Supreme Court · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.