Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. McMullen
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1882PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Douglas County. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.
This is a suit brought to enjoin the defendant, who is a lessee of the plaintiff, from the commission of waste upon the leased premises. Among other things, it is alleged in the words of the lease:—
“That it is stipulated and agreed by the defendant in said lease that he would take good care of said premises; to keep the same, the houses, fences, and improvements thereon, in good repair and order. It was further stipulated and agreed by the said defendant and plaintiff that the defendant should remove no wood or timber from said premises, except for his own use, and at no time and under no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fleming v. CollinsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1859
- Kane v. VanderburghNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
3Cited by7 opinions
- Roots v. Boring Junction Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Elliott v. BloydOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Sandy Holding Co. v. FerroOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Hanley v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1910
- Barnes v. EschOregon Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.