Vester v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
DODSON, Justice.
In this case, the jury convicted the appellant of first degree murder on a charge by information and assessed his punishment at confinement for a period of fifty years. Seeking reversal, he brings six grounds of error. By the first three grounds, he challenges the prosecutrix’s in-court identification of him, alleging that the pre-trial identification procedure (hypnosis of the prose-cutrix) violated his due process rights under the United States Constitution. By the last three grounds, he claims his conviction should be reversed because the State failed to disclose the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Monkhouse v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- Ledesma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Vester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- People v. ZayasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.