Legal Opinion
Vester v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided April 23, 1986No. 1017-83PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
ONION, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a jury conviction for first degree murder. Punishment assessed by the jury was for a period of fifty years.
On appeal the appellant, inter alia, urged that the trial court erred in failing to suppress the prosecutrix’s in-court identification, alleging that the pre-trial identification procedure (hypnosis of the prosecutrix) violated his due process rights under the United States Constitution. The Amarillo Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction. Vester v. State, 684 S.W.2d 715 (Tex.App.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spence v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Zani v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ramos v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
- Monkhouse v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1993
- Ledesma v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.