Legal Opinion

Stein v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 29, 1988No. A-2386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Alan Stein was convicted of unlawfully fishing in closed waters in violation of 5 Alaska Administrative Code (AAC) 33.-310(c)(5). The case was prosecuted on a strict liability theory as a violation pursuant to Beran v. State, 705 P.2d 1280 (Alaska App.1985). A fine of $1,000 was imposed and paid. Two years later, Stein moved, apparently in reliance on Alaska Criminal Rule 35(a), to correct his sentence and reduce the fine to $300. He relied on Constantine v. State, 739 P.2d 188 (Alaska App.1987), in which we held as a matter of statutory construction that the legislature had limited…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marrone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  2. Beran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Farleigh v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Constantine v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HutchinsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  4. State v. DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  5. State v. TriebNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API