Legal Opinion

Farleigh v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1986No. S-1162, S-1183PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

Petitioners in this case were each arrested and subsequently convicted for driving while intoxicated (DWI). Petitioners each made motions to suppress the results of breathalyzer tests administered to them on the ground that the police failed to preserve a breath sample. Their cases were stayed in the district court pending the outcome of a case before the court of appeals raising the same issue.

FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS.

On August 6, 1982, the court of appeals issued Municipality of Anchorage v. Serrano, 649 P.2d 256, 258 (Alaska App.1982), holding that results of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Arsenault v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. State v. GlassAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Briggs v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. RidgelyAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Pruitt v. State, Department of Public Safety, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Velez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  5. Vienna v. Scott Wetzel Services, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API