Constantine v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COATS, Judge.
This case raises the question of what noncriminal penalties the court is authorized to impose for the violation of a regulation.1 In Beran v. State, 705 P.2d 1280 (Alaska App.1985), we dealt with Fish and Game Regulation 5 AAC 39.002 which provides:
Liability for Violations. Unless otherwise provided in 5 AAC 01-5 AAC 41 or in AS 16, a person who violates a provision of 5 AAC 01-5 AAC 41 is strictly liable for the offense, regardless of his intent.
We concluded that the Board of Fisheries, in passing this regulation, intended to au*189thorize the imposition of criminal penalties…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Beran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- McCann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- State v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- Stein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
- Waiste v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.