Legal Opinion

Constantine v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 2, 1987No. A-1247, A-1409 and A-1414PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Judge.

This case raises the question of what noncriminal penalties the court is authorized to impose for the violation of a regulation.1 In Beran v. State, 705 P.2d 1280 (Alaska App.1985), we dealt with Fish and Game Regulation 5 AAC 39.002 which provides:

Liability for Violations. Unless otherwise provided in 5 AAC 01-5 AAC 41 or in AS 16, a person who violates a provision of 5 AAC 01-5 AAC 41 is strictly liable for the offense, regardless of his intent.

We concluded that the Board of Fisheries, in passing this regulation, intended to au*189thorize the imposition of criminal penalties…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McCann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  2. State v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  3. Stein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  4. Waiste v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
  5. State v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API