Legal Opinion
Rountree v. Lydick-Barmann Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided March 21, 1941No. 14195PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPEER, Justice.
Lydick-Barmann Co., a corporation, to which we shall refer as plaintiff, sued Jay Rountree, doing business as Ozark Motor Lines, to whom we shall refer as defendant, in Justice Court for $149.50, made up of two items, one for $129.50, the value of certain freight alleged to have been misde-livered, and the other for $20, claimed as a reasonable attorney fee, as provided by Article 2226, R.C.S.
The case was tried in the Justice Court and appealed to the County Court at Law No. 2 of Tarrant County, where it was again tried to the court without a jury, and judgment was entered for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- City Nat. Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & N. E. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- City National Bank of El Paso v. El Paso & Northeastern RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Estherville Produce Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- SJW Property Commerce, Inc. v. Southwest Pinnacle Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
- Greyvan Lines, Inc. v. NesmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1946
- Kesselman v. Mid-States Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1951
- Richardson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Alexander v. Stock Yards Nat. Bank of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.