Smith v. Heartland Automotive Services, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
Seven former Jiffy Lube Store Managers (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have sued Defendant Heartland Automotive Services, Inc. (“Heartland”), under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Plaintiffs allege that they have been improperly classified as exempt executives and thus deprived of overtime pay. Heartland now moves for summary judgment, arguing that Plaintiffs were properly classified as exempt executives, that any mis-classification of Plain tiffs’ exempt-status was not willful, and that the exemption classification was made in…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Donna Krenik v. County of Le SueurCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. Speedway SuperAmerica, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Ahle v. Veracity Research Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
- Grover v. Smarte Carte, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Cervantes v. CRST International, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2022
- Elsherif v. Mayo ClinicDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.