Legal Opinion

William A. Sundel v. Justices of the Superior Court of the State of Rhode Island

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 29, 1984No. 83-1702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Circuit Judge.

William Sundel was tried in Rhode Island state court on serious drug charges. David Breitbart, a New York lawyer, appeared pro hac vice to defend him, along with “associate” (or “local”) counsel John O’Neill. O’Neill also represented Sundel s codefendant. During the course of pretrial proceedings, the trial judge began to fear that Breitbart’s representation of his client was inadequate, perhaps because of Breit-bart’s ignorance of local rules and procedures. On the first day of trial, after observing Breitbart’s efforts to cross-examine the policeman who had seized the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. BennettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
  2. State v. FrielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  3. Burbine v. MoranDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
  4. Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. United States v. Daniel Phisco Ramirez, United States v. Jairo Vanegas-Ortiz, United States v. Jose Victor Santiago-Escobar, United States v. Roberto Piedrahita-Santiago, United States v. Anibal Pelaez-Escobar, United States v. Reyes Cardales-BarriosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API