William A. Sundel v. Justices of the Superior Court of the State of Rhode Island
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BREYER, Circuit Judge.
William Sundel was tried in Rhode Island state court on serious drug charges. David Breitbart, a New York lawyer, appeared pro hac vice to defend him, along with “associate” (or “local”) counsel John O’Neill. O’Neill also represented Sundel s codefendant. During the course of pretrial proceedings, the trial judge began to fear that Breitbart’s representation of his client was inadequate, perhaps because of Breit-bart’s ignorance of local rules and procedures. On the first day of trial, after observing Breitbart’s efforts to cross-examine the policeman who had seized the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. BennettSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. RamirezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- State v. FrielSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
- Burbine v. MoranDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1984
- Lee-Thomas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- United States v. Daniel Phisco Ramirez, United States v. Jairo Vanegas-Ortiz, United States v. Jose Victor Santiago-Escobar, United States v. Roberto Piedrahita-Santiago, United States v. Anibal Pelaez-Escobar, United States v. Reyes Cardales-BarriosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.