Legal Opinion

People v. Marilla

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This court has several times held — contrary to the view expressed in People v. Light (285 App. Div. 496) — that a defendant, prosecuted by indictment, may not on appeal avail himself of the trial court’s alleged failure to comply with section 433 of the Code of Criminal Procedure if he did not call such omission to the court’s attention. (See, e.g., People v. Manfredi, 1 N Y 2d 743; People v. Baumgart, 5 N Y 2d 874; see, also, People ex rel. Meers v. Martin, 4 N Y 2d 898.) The rationale underlying these decisions is that, if the defendant had alerted the trial judge to the possibility that a…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. LightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MercadoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. People v. AbelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. RundbladAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. People v. LynchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. BembryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API