Legal Opinion
Berry v. County of Sonoma
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 1991No. C-89-4476 SAWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEIGEL, District Judge.
The question presented in this case is whether the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (“the FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., requires defendants to pay overtime compensation to plaintiffs for each hour spent “on-call” from December 1986 to the present. This action was brought by Gregory Berry, Philip Marcus, Dennis McAllis-ter, and Francis Oravetz, current and former deputy coroners employed by the Sono-ma County Sheriff’s Department. Defendants are Sonoma County; Sonoma County Sheriff’s Department; Sonoma County Board of Supervisors; Richard…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Barrentine v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Owens v. Local No. 169, Ass'n of Western Pulp & Paper WorkersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Arnold J. Owens v. Local No. 169, Association of Western Pulp and Paper Workers, Third-Party-Defendant v. Itt Rayonier, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Berry v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Berry v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- McIntyre v. Division of Youth Rehabilitation Services, Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.