Legal Opinion

Hazley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 2008No. A07A2446PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

We granted Cornelius Hazley’s application for interlocutory review of the order denying his motion to suppress evidence that he was driving under the influence to the extent that he was less safe to drive and DUI per se. In this regard, OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (1) and (5) provide:

*559A person shall not drive or be in actual [possession] of any moving vehicle while: (1) Under the influence of alcohol to the extent that it is less safe for the person to drive; [or] (5) The person’s alcohol concentration is 0.08 grams or more at any time within three hours after such driving. . . .

After a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Vansant v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Slayton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Abelson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hammill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Taylor Whitfield Hammill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API