Hoffman v. State

Phipps, Judge.

Andrew M. Hoffman was convicted after a bench trial of driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) to the extent it was less safe for him to drive. On appeal, he contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction and that the court shifted the burden of proof to the defense. Because the record does not support either contention, we affirm.

1. Hoffman challenges the sufficiency of the evidence.

On appeal from a bench trial, we view the evidence with all inferences in favor of the factfinder’s conclusion, giving due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to…